Universals
may or may not exist. They are the general forms, or ideas, behind everything
that we experience in the corporeal world. The corporeal world is processed
through our senses. The world of universals can only be accessed through the
intellect. This is essentially the Platonic version of the universals, or
ideals. Examples of ideals are the form, general idea, or species “cat,” as
opposed to an actual example of a cat. The same could be said for chair, lamp,
candle, shirt, and so on.
Although
I like Plato’s delineation of the ideals, as he refers to them, I agree neither
with him nor with Aristotle about the nature of the ideals. I do not believe
that they exist on earth in the forms that represent them, as Aristotle
believed, or that they exist in a kind of Platonic heaven. I recognize that the
idea behind them was a breakthrough in thinking, leading to Aristotle’s
delineation of species by creating the idea of a genus, and I like that this
concept has been used practically, but to think that an idea actually existing
somewhere is frankly a little absurd. Numbers are examples of forms, so this is
akin to saying that the number two actually exists somewhere. There are plenty
of mathematicians who do believe this, and I find it a bit more plausible than
the idea of “cat” existing somewhere, but I also believe that it is inaccurate.
Abstract
entities create a lot of problems because they are, by definition, hard to
define and to pin down exactly, and because they can only be accessed through
the intellect, it is impossible to actually prove anything about them. However,
there are plenty of opinions on the forms, and I stay firm in mine. Universals
are merely a fabrication of the mind, and although if we had never existed, two
plus two would still equal four, it would not matter because there would not
have been anyone to first create that idea.
No comments:
Post a Comment